On July 24, 2020, the Trump Administration announced a new policy (the “Updated UAS Policy”) on exports of US-origin unmanned aerial systems (“UAS”), also known as “drones.”  The Updated UAS Policy follows the Trump Administration’s UAS policy reforms announced in April 2018 (“April 2018 UAS Export Policy”), which allowed exports of certain US-origin armed and unarmed UAS to occur via direct sales between US companies and foreign end users.  Our previous blog post on the April 2018 UAS Export Policy is available here.  The Updated UAS Policy does not change UAS export licensing requirements under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations or the Export Administration Regulations, but does remove a major restriction on exports of US-origin UAS. 

The Trump Administration’s new policy comes at a time when the UAS regulatory climate is undergoing rapid transformation.  As previously discussed on Baker McKenzie’s UAS Insights blog, the Federal Aviation Administration is in the process of promulgating regulations that would require UAS to have remote identification and would authorize UAS operations at night and over people, and is overseeing a pilot program to promote innovative UAS uses such as supply deliveries.

US Reinterpretation of the MTCR Guidelines

The Missile Technology Control Regime (“MTCR”) is an informal, voluntary arrangement among partner countries to limit the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapon delivery systems and related technology through common export policy guidelines.  Historically, military UAS and related sub-systems, software, and technology were listed in MTCR Category I.  Export license applications for MTCR Category I items are subject to an unconditional strong presumption of denial.  As part of the Updated UAS Policy, the Trump Administration will reinterpret the MTCR Guidelines so that a subset of MTCR Category I UAS with a maximum airspeed of less than 800 kilometers per hour will be listed under MTCR Category II.  MTCR Category II items are generally considered less-sensitive and are subject to case-by-case review in terms of export licensing.  The White House noted in a press statement released with the Updated UAS Policy that efforts begun in April 2018 to modify the MTCR’s guidelines had failed and thus the Trump Administration is now implementing this policy unilaterally.

Focus on Increasing UAS Exports

The Updated UAS Policy appears to be partially motivated by an effort to increase US manufacturers’ share of the UAS export market.  In the White House statement, the Trump Administration asserted that the policy change “will increase our national security by improving the capabilities of our partners and increase our economic security by opening the UAS market to United States industry.”  As such, the Updated UAS Policy reflects the broader effort to increase consideration of economic interests in arms transfer decisions under the Trump Administration and promote exports of UAS to US allies and partners.

Author

Jennifer Trock is chair of Baker McKenzie's International Commercial Practice Group and a member of its Global Aviation Group in Washington, DC. She co-leads the Firm's unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) focus team and is the Chair of the ABA's Forum Air & Space Law. Jennifer has been recognized by Chambers USA, Aviation Regulatory – National (2007-2019) and has also received honors from Euromoney’s Guide to the World’s Leading Aviation Lawyers, Infrastructure Journal and The Washingtonian.

Author

Ms. Lis has extensive experience advising companies on US laws relating to exports and reexports of commercial goods and technology, defense trade controls and trade sanctions — including licensing, regulatory interpretations, compliance programs and enforcement matters. She also has advised clients on national security reviews of foreign investment administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), including CFIUS-related due diligence, risk assessment, and representation before the CFIUS agencies.

Author

Alex advises clients on compliance with US export controls, trade and economic sanctions, export controls (Export Administration Regulations (EAR); International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)) and antiboycott controls. He counsels on and prepares filings to submit to the US Government's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) with respect to the acquisition of US enterprises by non-US interests. Moreover, Alex advises US and non-US companies in the context of licensing, enforcement actions, internal investigations, compliance audits, mergers and acquisitions and other cross-border transactions, and the design, implementation, and administration of compliance programs. He has negotiated enforcement settlements related to both US sanctions and the EAR.

Author

Will represents domestic and foreign airlines, private aircraft owners, aerospace manufacturers, and other businesses on a range of aviation-related DOT and FAA regulatory matters. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Will practiced at another international law firm, where he represented a major US airline in frequency allocation proceedings, antitrust immunity proceedings, and government investigations. He also has substantial experience in antitrust matters, having represented companies in high-profile mergers and acquisitions before DOJ and FTC, antitrust litigation, and civil and criminal investigations.

Author

Ryan’s practice focuses on International Trade law, particularly compliance with US export controls, trade and economic sanctions, and antiboycott laws. He also represents clients in national security reviews of foreign investment before the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).